- Arms Flows to Sub-Saharan AfricaPieter D. Wezeman, Siemon T. Wezeman and Lucie Béraud-Sudreau, SIPRI Policy Paper no. 30, 30 December 2011
- Israeli arms transfers to Sub-Saharan AfricaSiemon t. Wezeman, SIPRI Background Paper, October 2011
- After Iran: Prospects for Nuclear Proliferation in North AfricaBruno Tertrais, Non-Proliferation Education Center (NPEC) Paper, 17 October 2011
- Proliferation Issues on the African ContinentBart Smedts, RHID Focus Paper 11, December 2009
- Outlines for Future Conventional Arms Control in Europe: A Sub-Regional Regime in the BalticsEvgeny Buzhinskiy and Oleg Shakirov, European Leadership Network, September 2019
- Report: Re-Emerging Nuclear Risks in EuropeMaxwell Downman, British American Security Information Council (BASIC), May 2019
- Brexit: bad news for peaceDan Smith, Ian Davis, Commentary, July 20, 2016
- Conventional Arms Control in the Euro-Atlantic Region: Is it Desirable? Is it Achievable?Simon Lunn, Policy Brief, October 2013, 19p.
- Militarization and Militia-ization: Dynamics of Armed Group Proliferation in Egypt and LibyaRasmus Alenius Boserup and Virginie Collombier, Menara Working papers No.17, CIDOB/IAI, October 2018, 25pp.
- Russia’s Nuclear Ambitions in the Middle EastMatthew Cottee and Hassan Elbahtimy, Foreign Affairs, 20 May 2016
- Syria’s Proliferation Challenge and the European Union’s ResponseMichael Elleman, Dina Esfandiary, Emile Hokayem, NP paper, No. 20, July 2012, 20p.
- Toward a more secure and WMD free Middle EastMark Fitzpatrick, Report written for the United Nations Association of the UK, UNA - UK Briefing Report No.2, 26p., May 2012
- Future trends and challenges for the Middle East and North Africa: towards 2030Wilton Park Conference, Conference report for WP1138, 10p., January 2012
- Towards a Regional SecurIty Regime for the Middle East: Issues and OptionsThe Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Report of the SIPRI Middle East Expert Group with a new Afterword by Peter Jones, October 2011
- Agenda issues before the 2012 conference on a WMD-free zonePaul Ingram, September 2011, 3p., BASIC
- A Weapon of Mass Destruction-Free Zone in the Middle East: A Concept of Little Steps (in German)Harald Müller, HSFK-Report Nr. 5/2011
- Conventional strategic military capabilities in the Middle EastPieter D. Wezeman, Background paper, July 6-7, 2011
- Status of non-proliferation treaties, agreements, and other related instruments in the Middle EastDavid Santoro, Background paper, July 6-7, 2011
- A weapons of mass destruction-free zone in the Middle East: an incremental approachHarald Müller and Claudia Baumgart-Ochse, Background paper, July 6-7, 2011
- The Arms Control and Regional Security Working Group: still relevant to the Middle East?Peter Jones, Background paper, July 6-7, 2011
- A Zone free of WMD and means of delivery in the Middle East: an assessment of the multilateral diplomatic process, 1974–2010Benjamin Hautecouverture and Raphaëlle Mathiot, Background paper, July 6-7, 2011
- Nuclear capabilities in the Middle EastMark Fitzpatrick, Background paper, July 6-7, 2011
- Tailored Assurance: Balancing Deterrence and Disarmament in Responding to NATO-Russia TensionHeather Williams, Proliferation Papers, No. 59, July 2018
- EU-NATO cooperation: protecting the institutional relationship from political stormsJulia Himmrich, Denitsa Raynova, ELN Comment, June 21, 2017
- The 2016 NATO Summit: What will be on the agenda in Warsaw?Ian Anthony, Ian Davis, Commentary, 15 June 2016
- Is NATO Ready to Adapt to New Threats? The Bucharest Meeting and Allied SolidarityArtur Kacprzyk, Wojciech Lorenz, Bulletin PISM no 99 (831), 3 November 2015
- Britain, NATO, and the Nuclear Way ForwardTed Seay, 10 June 2015
- NATO-Russia Relations after the Newport Summit. Reassurance, Cooperation and Security GuaranteesMargarete Klein, Markus Kaim, SWP Comments No.41, 4p. October 2014
- Russia’s Violation of the INF Treaty: Consequences for NATOJacek Durkalec, PISM Bulletin No. 107 (702), 13 August 2014, 2p.
- Ukraine shows uselessness of NATO nukes in EuropeTom Sauer, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - Analysis, June 23, 2014
- Going non-nuclear in the nuclear alliance: the Danish experience in NATOCindy Vestergaard, European Security, Volume 23, Issue 1, January 24, 2014, pp.106-117
- The rise and fall of Spain’s ‘nuclear exceptionalism’Clara Portela, European Security, Routledge, January 2014, 17p.
- Starting the Process of Trust-Building in NATO–Russia Relations – The Arms Control DimensionJacek Durkalec, Ian Kearns, Lukasz Kulesa, Report, 33p. November 2013
- The Baltic States, NATO, and Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons in EuropeShatabhisha Shetty, Ian Kearns and Simon Lunn, Occasional Paper, December 2012, RUSI/ELN, 33p.
- Cruise Missiles and NATO Missile Defense: Under the Radar?Dennis M. Gormley, in Proliferation Papers, No.41, Spring 2012, 59p.
- Keeping NATO RelevantJamie Shea, Carnegie Europe, Policy Outlook, 20p., April 2012
- NATO’s Deterrence and Defence Posture Review and the Future of Nuclear WeaponsBASIC, Conference Report, Paris, 7p., March 2012
- After the Bombs are Gone: Thinking about a Europe free of US Nuclear WeaponsOliver Thränert, in Malcom Chalmers/Andrew Somerville (Eds.): If the Bombs Go: European Perspectives on NATO's Nuclear Debate, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), Whitehall Report 1-11, London 2011, pp. 51-58.
- Nuclear Arms and Missile Defense in Transatlantic SecurityOliver Thränert, Paper prepared for the Transatlantic Security Symposium 2010, November 2010, 18 p.
- Credible Deterrence for NATO in the XXI CenturyThe Polish Institute of International Affairs, Conference report, October 2010
- NATO and a Nuclear IranBruno Tertrais, Recherches & Documents N°09/2010, 22p., Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique
- US tactical nuclear weapons at Kleine Brogel in the context of contemporary international developmentsMarjolein Muys, Background Note 22 September 2010, 20 p.
- NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Future of Nuclear Disarmament in Europe (in German)Matthias Dembinski and Harald Müller, HSFK-Report Nr. 8/2010, Frankfurt/M.
- NATO Member States and the New Strategic Concept: An OverviewEdited by Beata Górka-Winter and Marek Madej , PISM Report, May 2010, 132 p.
- Reduce US Nukes in Europe to Zero, and Keep NATO Strong (and Nuclear). A View from Poland.Łukasz Kulesa , PISM Strategic Files N. 7, March 2009, 4 p.
- Non-proliferation and Disarmament : A Chronology of NATO’s «Multilateral Force » (1960-1965) (in French)Benjamin Hautecouverture, CESIM Historical Papers, June 2007
- Stalemate for Trump and Kim, as India and Pakistan Risk Nuclear War over KashmirRebecca Johnson, The Acronym Institute, February 2019
- Last to Escape, First to Disarm? Three Scenarios of Peace and War on the Korean PeninsulaUlrich Kühn and Heinrich Böll, VCDNP, September 2018
- The “Libyan Model“ is Unhelpful: Korea Needs its Own Process for Peace and Nuclear DisarmamentRebecca Johnson, The Acronym Institute, May 2018
- Looking into Mr. Kim Jong Un’s nuclear crystal ballRoberta Ballabio, Maurizio Martellini, May 2013, 5p.
- La communication dans le domaine de la ‘dissuasion stratégique’ : le cas de l’Inde et du Pakistan (in French)Jean-Luc Racine, FRS, January 2019
- Pakistan’s Nuclear and WMD Programmes: Status, Evolution and RisksBruno Tertrais, NP paper No. 19, July 2012, 20p.
- Pakistan as a Nuclear Power: Nuclear Risks, Regional Conflicts and the Dominant Role of the MilitaryOliver Thränert & Christian Wagner, SWP Research Paper, June 2009, German Institute for International and Security Affairs